St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy

Share St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy on Facebook Share St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy on Twitter Share St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy on Linkedin Email St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy link

This project is complete and final updates have been posted to the page. Thank you for your participation!

The County of Brant is inviting residents, landowners, developers, and community members to review the draft of the St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy and provide their feedback.

As the County of Brant continues to grow, ensuring access to safe, reliable, and sustainable water and wastewater services is critical, especially in the community of St. George, where servicing capacity is currently limited.

To support long-term growth, the County is investing in major upgrades, including:

  • An upgrade and expansion of the St. George Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) to 3,900 m³/day
  • A new water treatment facility with additional wells to

The County of Brant is inviting residents, landowners, developers, and community members to review the draft of the St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy and provide their feedback.

As the County of Brant continues to grow, ensuring access to safe, reliable, and sustainable water and wastewater services is critical, especially in the community of St. George, where servicing capacity is currently limited.

To support long-term growth, the County is investing in major upgrades, including:

  • An upgrade and expansion of the St. George Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) to 3,900 m³/day
  • A new water treatment facility with additional wells to improve system reliability

However, the amount of proposed development in St. George exceeds the upgraded wastewater system’s capacity. That’s why the County has developed a draft Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy, a fair and transparent plan that outlines how limited servicing will be assigned to support future development.

Summary of the Draft Policy

The draft St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy outlines how the County will allocate limited wastewater servicing capacity in a sustainable and cost-effective manner.

Proposed Allocation:

  • 625 m³/day – For the existing St. George community
  • 2,500 m³/day – Reserved for the Landowners Group (developers contributing financially to infrastructure upgrades)
  • 363 m³/day – For infill developments within the built boundary
  • 412 m³/day – For higher-density developments or projects not previously considered

Eligibility and Timing:

  • Only developments with Draft Plan Approval and meeting all registration conditions are eligible.
  • Developments are reviewed on a first-come, first-served basis, except for the Landowners Group (which has agreed to finance part of the infrastructure costs).
  • Infill developments will have priority access while capacity is available.

Ongoing Tracking: The County will update and share its Capacity Tracking Tool twice a year to provide transparency.

This policy ensures that development in St. George happens in a responsible, financially sustainable, and environmentally sound way while supporting future community needs.

FAQs

We have included a list of frequently asked questions to help answer some questions you may have.

Stay Informed

Subscribe for updates and be the first to get updates. Simply add your email to the Stay Informed box on this page and click ‘Subscribe'.

This project is complete and final updates have been posted to the page. Thank you for your participation!

County of Brant Staff aim to maintain a respectful and constructive dialogue with the public through all forms of communication. We understand and appreciate that people will have differing opinions and concerns, and welcome all feedback, questions, and comments in a respectful and constructive manner.

Please ask your question or leave your comment below. We will do our best to respond within 3 business days. You may also find answers to some of your questions on our FAQs page.

  • Share We have been in St George for 5 years and were part of the Stoney Ridge Phase 2 development by BrantStar Developments. Within the 5 years we have seen our taxes increase by 20.068% and the Municipal Tax Rate increase by 20.60% which is unacceptable as we are retired and do not want to have the burden of additional taxes to supplement the Landowners for these developments. -When is the waste water increased volume engineering plan going for design and county review - When will the Stoney Ridge Phase 3 commence as we understand that it cannot be completed without the additional waste water capacity and water wells projects being completed? - Our current water pressure ranges from 42-46 PS1 and municipalities such as Brantford and Cambridge have a design rate of 50-70 PSI. Will the water pressure be addressed in St George as we are less than 500 meters from the water tower with this lower PSI volume? on Facebook Share We have been in St George for 5 years and were part of the Stoney Ridge Phase 2 development by BrantStar Developments. Within the 5 years we have seen our taxes increase by 20.068% and the Municipal Tax Rate increase by 20.60% which is unacceptable as we are retired and do not want to have the burden of additional taxes to supplement the Landowners for these developments. -When is the waste water increased volume engineering plan going for design and county review - When will the Stoney Ridge Phase 3 commence as we understand that it cannot be completed without the additional waste water capacity and water wells projects being completed? - Our current water pressure ranges from 42-46 PS1 and municipalities such as Brantford and Cambridge have a design rate of 50-70 PSI. Will the water pressure be addressed in St George as we are less than 500 meters from the water tower with this lower PSI volume? on Twitter Share We have been in St George for 5 years and were part of the Stoney Ridge Phase 2 development by BrantStar Developments. Within the 5 years we have seen our taxes increase by 20.068% and the Municipal Tax Rate increase by 20.60% which is unacceptable as we are retired and do not want to have the burden of additional taxes to supplement the Landowners for these developments. -When is the waste water increased volume engineering plan going for design and county review - When will the Stoney Ridge Phase 3 commence as we understand that it cannot be completed without the additional waste water capacity and water wells projects being completed? - Our current water pressure ranges from 42-46 PS1 and municipalities such as Brantford and Cambridge have a design rate of 50-70 PSI. Will the water pressure be addressed in St George as we are less than 500 meters from the water tower with this lower PSI volume? on Linkedin Email We have been in St George for 5 years and were part of the Stoney Ridge Phase 2 development by BrantStar Developments. Within the 5 years we have seen our taxes increase by 20.068% and the Municipal Tax Rate increase by 20.60% which is unacceptable as we are retired and do not want to have the burden of additional taxes to supplement the Landowners for these developments. -When is the waste water increased volume engineering plan going for design and county review - When will the Stoney Ridge Phase 3 commence as we understand that it cannot be completed without the additional waste water capacity and water wells projects being completed? - Our current water pressure ranges from 42-46 PS1 and municipalities such as Brantford and Cambridge have a design rate of 50-70 PSI. Will the water pressure be addressed in St George as we are less than 500 meters from the water tower with this lower PSI volume? link

    We have been in St George for 5 years and were part of the Stoney Ridge Phase 2 development by BrantStar Developments. Within the 5 years we have seen our taxes increase by 20.068% and the Municipal Tax Rate increase by 20.60% which is unacceptable as we are retired and do not want to have the burden of additional taxes to supplement the Landowners for these developments. -When is the waste water increased volume engineering plan going for design and county review - When will the Stoney Ridge Phase 3 commence as we understand that it cannot be completed without the additional waste water capacity and water wells projects being completed? - Our current water pressure ranges from 42-46 PS1 and municipalities such as Brantford and Cambridge have a design rate of 50-70 PSI. Will the water pressure be addressed in St George as we are less than 500 meters from the water tower with this lower PSI volume?

    HAMILTON asked 5 months ago

    Thanks for your comments and questions. 

    The St. George wastewater treatment plant expansion will be funded by development charges, a provincial HEWSF grant, and wastewater reserves. As such, tax rates will not be impacted by this project.

    Detailed design of the wastewater treatment plant expansion is nearly complete, and construction is anticipated to begin in fall 2025.

    The Stoney Ridge Phase 3 subdivision can proceed ahead of the wastewater treatment plant expansion.

    A new municipal well and water treatment facility is planned for Howell Road, but system water pressures are not anticipated to change significantly with this future project.

    Please register at EngageBrant.ca/register to be notified of future engagement opportunities with the County of Brant. 

    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P. Eng.

    County of Brant

  • Share Hi, I appreciate the transparency and answer to my prior question. I have a few more questions / comments. 1 - I want to confirm that existing resident taxations should not be impacted by expansion investments, as they should be paid via developers and the new taxation collected from the expanding community. I see the developers are covering some costs... in such a desirable neighbourhood, perhaps there is room for them to cover more. 2 - In business growth means efficiency, I assume this should be the same for services like garbage collection and snow removal - with a higher density is the county negotiating some cost efficiency / reductions from these providers? Tax increases are often related to these items. 3 - Is there a masterplan for the community of St. George that is being reviewed for public input? Ie - additional schools / recreational complexes, service business district for restaurants etc, 4 - Community groups such as the Lions club have been involved in some wonderful projects in this community - are they being leveraged / consulted for projects that could require community fundraising? Always better to plan space up front. Ie - better baseball complex with outfield fences, additional soccer pitches as teams currently use the school yard and share space for practice due to insufficient facilities already. on Facebook Share Hi, I appreciate the transparency and answer to my prior question. I have a few more questions / comments. 1 - I want to confirm that existing resident taxations should not be impacted by expansion investments, as they should be paid via developers and the new taxation collected from the expanding community. I see the developers are covering some costs... in such a desirable neighbourhood, perhaps there is room for them to cover more. 2 - In business growth means efficiency, I assume this should be the same for services like garbage collection and snow removal - with a higher density is the county negotiating some cost efficiency / reductions from these providers? Tax increases are often related to these items. 3 - Is there a masterplan for the community of St. George that is being reviewed for public input? Ie - additional schools / recreational complexes, service business district for restaurants etc, 4 - Community groups such as the Lions club have been involved in some wonderful projects in this community - are they being leveraged / consulted for projects that could require community fundraising? Always better to plan space up front. Ie - better baseball complex with outfield fences, additional soccer pitches as teams currently use the school yard and share space for practice due to insufficient facilities already. on Twitter Share Hi, I appreciate the transparency and answer to my prior question. I have a few more questions / comments. 1 - I want to confirm that existing resident taxations should not be impacted by expansion investments, as they should be paid via developers and the new taxation collected from the expanding community. I see the developers are covering some costs... in such a desirable neighbourhood, perhaps there is room for them to cover more. 2 - In business growth means efficiency, I assume this should be the same for services like garbage collection and snow removal - with a higher density is the county negotiating some cost efficiency / reductions from these providers? Tax increases are often related to these items. 3 - Is there a masterplan for the community of St. George that is being reviewed for public input? Ie - additional schools / recreational complexes, service business district for restaurants etc, 4 - Community groups such as the Lions club have been involved in some wonderful projects in this community - are they being leveraged / consulted for projects that could require community fundraising? Always better to plan space up front. Ie - better baseball complex with outfield fences, additional soccer pitches as teams currently use the school yard and share space for practice due to insufficient facilities already. on Linkedin Email Hi, I appreciate the transparency and answer to my prior question. I have a few more questions / comments. 1 - I want to confirm that existing resident taxations should not be impacted by expansion investments, as they should be paid via developers and the new taxation collected from the expanding community. I see the developers are covering some costs... in such a desirable neighbourhood, perhaps there is room for them to cover more. 2 - In business growth means efficiency, I assume this should be the same for services like garbage collection and snow removal - with a higher density is the county negotiating some cost efficiency / reductions from these providers? Tax increases are often related to these items. 3 - Is there a masterplan for the community of St. George that is being reviewed for public input? Ie - additional schools / recreational complexes, service business district for restaurants etc, 4 - Community groups such as the Lions club have been involved in some wonderful projects in this community - are they being leveraged / consulted for projects that could require community fundraising? Always better to plan space up front. Ie - better baseball complex with outfield fences, additional soccer pitches as teams currently use the school yard and share space for practice due to insufficient facilities already. link

    Hi, I appreciate the transparency and answer to my prior question. I have a few more questions / comments. 1 - I want to confirm that existing resident taxations should not be impacted by expansion investments, as they should be paid via developers and the new taxation collected from the expanding community. I see the developers are covering some costs... in such a desirable neighbourhood, perhaps there is room for them to cover more. 2 - In business growth means efficiency, I assume this should be the same for services like garbage collection and snow removal - with a higher density is the county negotiating some cost efficiency / reductions from these providers? Tax increases are often related to these items. 3 - Is there a masterplan for the community of St. George that is being reviewed for public input? Ie - additional schools / recreational complexes, service business district for restaurants etc, 4 - Community groups such as the Lions club have been involved in some wonderful projects in this community - are they being leveraged / consulted for projects that could require community fundraising? Always better to plan space up front. Ie - better baseball complex with outfield fences, additional soccer pitches as teams currently use the school yard and share space for practice due to insufficient facilities already.

    Jeff Sinko asked 5 months ago

    Thanks for your follow-up questions. Responses are provided below following the order of your questions.

    1. The St. George wastewater treatment plant expansion will be funded by development charges, a provincial HEWSF grant, and wastewater reserves. As such, tax rates will not be impacted by this project.
    2. As the community grows, some minor economy-of-scale benefits may be realized for some services such as snow plowing and garbage collection. Snow plowing on municipal streets is performed by the County Roads division, while garbage collection is performed by a service contractor. In the case of garbage collection, the work is awarded through a competitive bid process which would be based on proposed collection routes during that contract period.
    3. The County of Brant completed Class Environmental Assessments in 2021 and 2023 for water and wastewater servicing to support the anticipated community growth in St. George within the 2051 planning horizon.  Additional studies were completed in 2023 to coordinate both servicing and land use planning for the community. The additional studies completed in 2023 can be found on Engage Brant at EngageBrant.ca/StGeorgeStudy.
    4. This Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy is specific to the County’s planned water and wastewater infrastructure projects in St. George. Community fundraising hasn’t been considered for these water and wastewater projects, but could be considered for some of the future community projects that you’ve mentioned.


    Please register at EngageBrant.ca/register to be notified of future engagement opportunities with the County of Brant. 

    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P. Eng.

    County of Brant

  • Share Hi, I’m curious what the current daily average usage is in St George today, and what the max usage is. Thanks! on Facebook Share Hi, I’m curious what the current daily average usage is in St George today, and what the max usage is. Thanks! on Twitter Share Hi, I’m curious what the current daily average usage is in St George today, and what the max usage is. Thanks! on Linkedin Email Hi, I’m curious what the current daily average usage is in St George today, and what the max usage is. Thanks! link

    Hi, I’m curious what the current daily average usage is in St George today, and what the max usage is. Thanks!

    Jeff Sinko asked 5 months ago

    Thank you for your question. In 2024, the average day water use in St. George was 822 m3/day, and the max day usage was 1,309 m3/day. Average day wastewater flows were 618 m3/day. Complete annual reports for the County’s water and wastewater systems can be accessed here: https://www.brant.ca/en/water-services/operational-reports.aspx.

    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P. Eng.

    County of Brant

  • Share Dear County of Brant team, I’m writing as a concerned resident of St. George regarding the draft Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy. First of all, I appreciate that the County is proactively investing in infrastructure and giving residents a chance to provide feedback. That said, I do have a few concerns about how the new capacity is being allocated. Based on what I understand from the draft policy, the majority of the upgraded wastewater capacity (2,500 m³/day) is being set aside for the Landowners Group of developers, while only 625 m³/day is allocated for the existing community. This feels disproportionate and/or that an abundance of new development is being planned. Like many residents, I chose St. George for its small-town character. While I understand the need to accommodate growth, I believe that development should be done responsibly, with the environment, and current residents’ needs and voices at the centre. I’d like to respectfully request that the County: • Reconsider the proportion of capacity allocated to developers versus existing residents and infill projects • Prioritize smaller, community-based growth that aligns with the existing character of St. George • Provide stronger protections for farmland, green space, and heritage areas • Offer transparency about how future development decisions will be made and monitored I also have a few questions to help me better understand the draft policy: 1. How was the 2,500 m³/day allocation for the Landowners Group calculated? Was it based on existing applications or future development projections? 2. What does the County consider a “higher-density” project, and how many of these are currently being proposed? 3. Will there be any public oversight or community involvement in approving new developments tied to this allocation? 4. What mechanisms will be in place to protect the town’s infrastructure, schools, roads, and environment from being overwhelmed by rapid development? 5. What options exist to re-balance this policy if residents voice widespread concerns? Can the current draft be significantly revised based on feedback? 6. Will there be assessments and ongoing monitoring of water quality and environmental impact before/during any proposed new developments? 7. If residents raise environmental concerns as part of this feedback process, how will those be factored into the final policy? Thank you again for your time and for involving the community in this important discussion. on Facebook Share Dear County of Brant team, I’m writing as a concerned resident of St. George regarding the draft Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy. First of all, I appreciate that the County is proactively investing in infrastructure and giving residents a chance to provide feedback. That said, I do have a few concerns about how the new capacity is being allocated. Based on what I understand from the draft policy, the majority of the upgraded wastewater capacity (2,500 m³/day) is being set aside for the Landowners Group of developers, while only 625 m³/day is allocated for the existing community. This feels disproportionate and/or that an abundance of new development is being planned. Like many residents, I chose St. George for its small-town character. While I understand the need to accommodate growth, I believe that development should be done responsibly, with the environment, and current residents’ needs and voices at the centre. I’d like to respectfully request that the County: • Reconsider the proportion of capacity allocated to developers versus existing residents and infill projects • Prioritize smaller, community-based growth that aligns with the existing character of St. George • Provide stronger protections for farmland, green space, and heritage areas • Offer transparency about how future development decisions will be made and monitored I also have a few questions to help me better understand the draft policy: 1. How was the 2,500 m³/day allocation for the Landowners Group calculated? Was it based on existing applications or future development projections? 2. What does the County consider a “higher-density” project, and how many of these are currently being proposed? 3. Will there be any public oversight or community involvement in approving new developments tied to this allocation? 4. What mechanisms will be in place to protect the town’s infrastructure, schools, roads, and environment from being overwhelmed by rapid development? 5. What options exist to re-balance this policy if residents voice widespread concerns? Can the current draft be significantly revised based on feedback? 6. Will there be assessments and ongoing monitoring of water quality and environmental impact before/during any proposed new developments? 7. If residents raise environmental concerns as part of this feedback process, how will those be factored into the final policy? Thank you again for your time and for involving the community in this important discussion. on Twitter Share Dear County of Brant team, I’m writing as a concerned resident of St. George regarding the draft Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy. First of all, I appreciate that the County is proactively investing in infrastructure and giving residents a chance to provide feedback. That said, I do have a few concerns about how the new capacity is being allocated. Based on what I understand from the draft policy, the majority of the upgraded wastewater capacity (2,500 m³/day) is being set aside for the Landowners Group of developers, while only 625 m³/day is allocated for the existing community. This feels disproportionate and/or that an abundance of new development is being planned. Like many residents, I chose St. George for its small-town character. While I understand the need to accommodate growth, I believe that development should be done responsibly, with the environment, and current residents’ needs and voices at the centre. I’d like to respectfully request that the County: • Reconsider the proportion of capacity allocated to developers versus existing residents and infill projects • Prioritize smaller, community-based growth that aligns with the existing character of St. George • Provide stronger protections for farmland, green space, and heritage areas • Offer transparency about how future development decisions will be made and monitored I also have a few questions to help me better understand the draft policy: 1. How was the 2,500 m³/day allocation for the Landowners Group calculated? Was it based on existing applications or future development projections? 2. What does the County consider a “higher-density” project, and how many of these are currently being proposed? 3. Will there be any public oversight or community involvement in approving new developments tied to this allocation? 4. What mechanisms will be in place to protect the town’s infrastructure, schools, roads, and environment from being overwhelmed by rapid development? 5. What options exist to re-balance this policy if residents voice widespread concerns? Can the current draft be significantly revised based on feedback? 6. Will there be assessments and ongoing monitoring of water quality and environmental impact before/during any proposed new developments? 7. If residents raise environmental concerns as part of this feedback process, how will those be factored into the final policy? Thank you again for your time and for involving the community in this important discussion. on Linkedin Email Dear County of Brant team, I’m writing as a concerned resident of St. George regarding the draft Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy. First of all, I appreciate that the County is proactively investing in infrastructure and giving residents a chance to provide feedback. That said, I do have a few concerns about how the new capacity is being allocated. Based on what I understand from the draft policy, the majority of the upgraded wastewater capacity (2,500 m³/day) is being set aside for the Landowners Group of developers, while only 625 m³/day is allocated for the existing community. This feels disproportionate and/or that an abundance of new development is being planned. Like many residents, I chose St. George for its small-town character. While I understand the need to accommodate growth, I believe that development should be done responsibly, with the environment, and current residents’ needs and voices at the centre. I’d like to respectfully request that the County: • Reconsider the proportion of capacity allocated to developers versus existing residents and infill projects • Prioritize smaller, community-based growth that aligns with the existing character of St. George • Provide stronger protections for farmland, green space, and heritage areas • Offer transparency about how future development decisions will be made and monitored I also have a few questions to help me better understand the draft policy: 1. How was the 2,500 m³/day allocation for the Landowners Group calculated? Was it based on existing applications or future development projections? 2. What does the County consider a “higher-density” project, and how many of these are currently being proposed? 3. Will there be any public oversight or community involvement in approving new developments tied to this allocation? 4. What mechanisms will be in place to protect the town’s infrastructure, schools, roads, and environment from being overwhelmed by rapid development? 5. What options exist to re-balance this policy if residents voice widespread concerns? Can the current draft be significantly revised based on feedback? 6. Will there be assessments and ongoing monitoring of water quality and environmental impact before/during any proposed new developments? 7. If residents raise environmental concerns as part of this feedback process, how will those be factored into the final policy? Thank you again for your time and for involving the community in this important discussion. link

    Dear County of Brant team, I’m writing as a concerned resident of St. George regarding the draft Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy. First of all, I appreciate that the County is proactively investing in infrastructure and giving residents a chance to provide feedback. That said, I do have a few concerns about how the new capacity is being allocated. Based on what I understand from the draft policy, the majority of the upgraded wastewater capacity (2,500 m³/day) is being set aside for the Landowners Group of developers, while only 625 m³/day is allocated for the existing community. This feels disproportionate and/or that an abundance of new development is being planned. Like many residents, I chose St. George for its small-town character. While I understand the need to accommodate growth, I believe that development should be done responsibly, with the environment, and current residents’ needs and voices at the centre. I’d like to respectfully request that the County: • Reconsider the proportion of capacity allocated to developers versus existing residents and infill projects • Prioritize smaller, community-based growth that aligns with the existing character of St. George • Provide stronger protections for farmland, green space, and heritage areas • Offer transparency about how future development decisions will be made and monitored I also have a few questions to help me better understand the draft policy: 1. How was the 2,500 m³/day allocation for the Landowners Group calculated? Was it based on existing applications or future development projections? 2. What does the County consider a “higher-density” project, and how many of these are currently being proposed? 3. Will there be any public oversight or community involvement in approving new developments tied to this allocation? 4. What mechanisms will be in place to protect the town’s infrastructure, schools, roads, and environment from being overwhelmed by rapid development? 5. What options exist to re-balance this policy if residents voice widespread concerns? Can the current draft be significantly revised based on feedback? 6. Will there be assessments and ongoing monitoring of water quality and environmental impact before/during any proposed new developments? 7. If residents raise environmental concerns as part of this feedback process, how will those be factored into the final policy? Thank you again for your time and for involving the community in this important discussion.

    Petrelan asked 5 months ago

    Thank you for your thoughtful and respectful post, and for taking the time to review the draft Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy. We understand and appreciate the care you have for St. George’s small-town character and community well-being. Your questions and feedback are most helpful.

     

    The County of Brant did complete a Class Environmental Assessments in 2021 and 2023 for water and wastewater servicing to support the anticipated community growth in St. George within the 2051 planning horizon. Additional studies were completed in 2023 to coordinate both servicing and land use planning for the community. The additional studies completed in 2023 can be found on Engage Brant at EngageBrant.ca/StGeorgeStudy.

     

    The 625 m³/day allocation was based on 2024 average flows to the St. George Wastewater Treatment Plant (618 m³/day). This ensures the existing community is accounted for in full. The 2,500 m³/day allocation set aside for the Landowners Group reflects the cumulative demand from their approved residential development plans, based on a standard per-person flow rate. 

     

    In addition to this, a 7.5% allocation is reserved to support higher-density infill and intensification. These are projects where the proposed number of housing units may be higher than originally planned, such as replacing low-density homes with townhomes or apartments, or adding Additional Residential Units (ARUs). These are prioritized to align with provincial and County goals for sustainable growth and complete communities. 

     

    As noted above, several studies have already been completed that included community engagement, but there will be additional opportunities in the future as proposed developments are reviewed through the Planning process. Please be sure to register at EngageBrant.ca/register and be the first to be notified of upcoming community engagement projects.

     

    This policy is not the only mechanism to control how development proceeds, or how environmental impacts are monitored. The County reviews development proposals in coordination with school boards, infrastructure and traffic engineers, and environmental agencies to ensure that roads, schools, and services can support any proposed growth. Environmental Protection Act requirements will also continue to apply to all new construction. As a result of the study undertaken in 2023, there are zoning provisions in place to ensure that no developments can start until servicing and planning conditions are met. 

     

    Environmental protection and community character were also key components of the 2023 Official Plan. As part of that plan, we have updated the County’s Natural Heritage (NH) zoning and added Vegetative Protection (NH1) zones, floodplain overlays, and heritage overlays to safeguard sensitive areas. Future Environmental Impact Studies (EIS) may be required for development near features such as these, and environmental concerns raised by the public will be considered when finalizing the policy.

     

    This allocation policy’s purpose is to ensure fair and transparent capacity planning as the water and wastewater plant expands. It is also a draft policy, and public feedback will be considered and contribute to how it evolves. As with municipalities all over Ontario, growth will continue in the County, but we are working to shape it responsibly, with input like yours guiding the process.

     

    Thank you again for contributing to this important discussion. Your voice matters and will help shape how St. George grows while preserving what makes it special.

    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P. Eng.

    County of Brant

  • Share Our water system will be strained too much to accommodate new housing. Can't see adding over a thousand homes to our current system...Taxes keep rising our water bills keep rising with no end in sight. Don't think it's wise to push us to capacity on our current system. We are a small town that can't afford a huge infrastructure upgrade to pay for. Build somewhere else that can handle it...Not here thank-you on Facebook Share Our water system will be strained too much to accommodate new housing. Can't see adding over a thousand homes to our current system...Taxes keep rising our water bills keep rising with no end in sight. Don't think it's wise to push us to capacity on our current system. We are a small town that can't afford a huge infrastructure upgrade to pay for. Build somewhere else that can handle it...Not here thank-you on Twitter Share Our water system will be strained too much to accommodate new housing. Can't see adding over a thousand homes to our current system...Taxes keep rising our water bills keep rising with no end in sight. Don't think it's wise to push us to capacity on our current system. We are a small town that can't afford a huge infrastructure upgrade to pay for. Build somewhere else that can handle it...Not here thank-you on Linkedin Email Our water system will be strained too much to accommodate new housing. Can't see adding over a thousand homes to our current system...Taxes keep rising our water bills keep rising with no end in sight. Don't think it's wise to push us to capacity on our current system. We are a small town that can't afford a huge infrastructure upgrade to pay for. Build somewhere else that can handle it...Not here thank-you link

    Our water system will be strained too much to accommodate new housing. Can't see adding over a thousand homes to our current system...Taxes keep rising our water bills keep rising with no end in sight. Don't think it's wise to push us to capacity on our current system. We are a small town that can't afford a huge infrastructure upgrade to pay for. Build somewhere else that can handle it...Not here thank-you

    Blader asked 5 months ago

    Thank you for your comments. The County of Brant completed a Class Environmental Assessment in 2023 that recommended the construction of a new municipal well and water treatment facility near Howell Road to provide system redundancy and support the planned growth of the community of St. George. Detailed design of the new well and water treatment facility is planned to be completed over the next several years.
    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P. Eng.

    County of Brant

  • Share Thank you for putting this information out. What percentage of the total costings are the land developers paying? I see they’re allocated four times as much. Will they pay at the same rate as residents? on Facebook Share Thank you for putting this information out. What percentage of the total costings are the land developers paying? I see they’re allocated four times as much. Will they pay at the same rate as residents? on Twitter Share Thank you for putting this information out. What percentage of the total costings are the land developers paying? I see they’re allocated four times as much. Will they pay at the same rate as residents? on Linkedin Email Thank you for putting this information out. What percentage of the total costings are the land developers paying? I see they’re allocated four times as much. Will they pay at the same rate as residents? link

    Thank you for putting this information out. What percentage of the total costings are the land developers paying? I see they’re allocated four times as much. Will they pay at the same rate as residents?

    Claire Stewart asked 5 months ago

    Thank you for your question. The St. George wastewater treatment plant expansion is currently estimated to have a capital cost of approximately $59.7M. The majority of the project cost will be funded by development charges and a Provincial grant through the Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund (HEWSF).  Approximately $5M will be funded by the County’s wastewater rates and reserves.

    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P.Eng.

    County of Brant

  • Share Schedule A and B were not attached to the draft policy. Further. The increase in wastewater flows is over 6 fold. Has the county completed the necessary assimilative capacity study for Fairchilds creek? The full capacity of 3900 m3 is a substantive increase in flows. on Facebook Share Schedule A and B were not attached to the draft policy. Further. The increase in wastewater flows is over 6 fold. Has the county completed the necessary assimilative capacity study for Fairchilds creek? The full capacity of 3900 m3 is a substantive increase in flows. on Twitter Share Schedule A and B were not attached to the draft policy. Further. The increase in wastewater flows is over 6 fold. Has the county completed the necessary assimilative capacity study for Fairchilds creek? The full capacity of 3900 m3 is a substantive increase in flows. on Linkedin Email Schedule A and B were not attached to the draft policy. Further. The increase in wastewater flows is over 6 fold. Has the county completed the necessary assimilative capacity study for Fairchilds creek? The full capacity of 3900 m3 is a substantive increase in flows. link

    Schedule A and B were not attached to the draft policy. Further. The increase in wastewater flows is over 6 fold. Has the county completed the necessary assimilative capacity study for Fairchilds creek? The full capacity of 3900 m3 is a substantive increase in flows.

    Secookee asked 5 months ago

    Thank you for your question. Schedule A and B are listed as Attachment 1 (St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Tracking Figures) in the ‘Documents’ section of this page. 

     

    An Assimilative Capacity Analysis was completed as part of the St. George Wastewater Servicing Class Environmental Assessment (2021). To clarify, the current wastewater treatment plant has a rated capacity of 1,300 m3/day and the expanded plant will have a rated capacity of 3,900 m3/day.

    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P.Eng.

    County of Brant

  • Share My property is surrounded by the Losani development Phase 3. As per discussions during the OPA hearing potential development on my land was "agreed to" so at what point would I need to reserve allocation for any future development on my land and also for a connection to my principal residence ? on Facebook Share My property is surrounded by the Losani development Phase 3. As per discussions during the OPA hearing potential development on my land was "agreed to" so at what point would I need to reserve allocation for any future development on my land and also for a connection to my principal residence ? on Twitter Share My property is surrounded by the Losani development Phase 3. As per discussions during the OPA hearing potential development on my land was "agreed to" so at what point would I need to reserve allocation for any future development on my land and also for a connection to my principal residence ? on Linkedin Email My property is surrounded by the Losani development Phase 3. As per discussions during the OPA hearing potential development on my land was "agreed to" so at what point would I need to reserve allocation for any future development on my land and also for a connection to my principal residence ? link

    My property is surrounded by the Losani development Phase 3. As per discussions during the OPA hearing potential development on my land was "agreed to" so at what point would I need to reserve allocation for any future development on my land and also for a connection to my principal residence ?

    JHN asked 5 months ago

    Thank you for your question. The draft policy proposes that servicing capacity is allocated to any new developments on a first-come, first-served basis through the completion of a development agreement. The following statement is noted in the draft policy:

    All proposed developments not identified in the table above will be considered for capacity on a first-come, first-served basis as they are preparing to register. Pre-consultation with County staff is always recommended if a developer is unsure if capacity exists. No new development, except for the developments in the Front-Ending Agreement (Landowners Group), is guaranteed water and wastewater capacity until it is registered.

    For more specific development questions about your property, you may want to get in touch with the County’s Planning and Development department. Feel free to send an email to info@brant.ca to get connected with Planning.

    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P.Eng.

    County of Brant

  • Share Why don't they build higher buildings in the city that they have already destroyed or convert all the abonded factories and manufacturing facilities that have moved to China and turn them into "housing"? Why do you want to destroy every small community in the country? on Facebook Share Why don't they build higher buildings in the city that they have already destroyed or convert all the abonded factories and manufacturing facilities that have moved to China and turn them into "housing"? Why do you want to destroy every small community in the country? on Twitter Share Why don't they build higher buildings in the city that they have already destroyed or convert all the abonded factories and manufacturing facilities that have moved to China and turn them into "housing"? Why do you want to destroy every small community in the country? on Linkedin Email Why don't they build higher buildings in the city that they have already destroyed or convert all the abonded factories and manufacturing facilities that have moved to China and turn them into "housing"? Why do you want to destroy every small community in the country? link

    Why don't they build higher buildings in the city that they have already destroyed or convert all the abonded factories and manufacturing facilities that have moved to China and turn them into "housing"? Why do you want to destroy every small community in the country?

    Keba79 asked 5 months ago

    Thank you for your interest in this project. The St. George wastewater treatment plant is being expanded to accommodate proposed developments within the community, some of which include redevelopment of existing facilities. In addition to and far from wanting to “destroy” small towns, the policy is about stewardship, ensuring that growth enhances, not erodes, the community.

    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P.Eng

    County of Brant

  • Share How does this impact the Oaks of St George golf course on Facebook Share How does this impact the Oaks of St George golf course on Twitter Share How does this impact the Oaks of St George golf course on Linkedin Email How does this impact the Oaks of St George golf course link

    How does this impact the Oaks of St George golf course

    Trevor asked 5 months ago

    Thank you for your question. The draft St. George Water and Wastewater Capacity Allocation Policy reserves capacity for the Land Owner’s Group, which includes The Oaks of St. George Golf Club.

    Thank you,

    Mark Maxwell, P. Eng.

    County of Brant